"What Gives Bush the Right to Destabilize Iran with MY Taxdollars?"

What gives Bush the right to destabilize Iran by covert military operations?
by Brian Appleton(CASMII Columns)
Sunday, July 6, 2008

What a miserable little excuse for a human being Mr. Bush is. What gives him the right to attempt to destabilize the government of another country covertly with our tax payers money because they refuse to be his vassal state.

Amplifying a theme posted in my diary on DailyKos the other day, How to Reduce Gas Prices & Save US Economy: TRADE with Iran., Appleton wrote:

He does not have the imagination or honesty or desire to make earnest attempts at peace in a win win style negotiation which would be beneficial to both sides...covert operations, sanctions and bombing are the only tools in his bag and he has badgered our Congress and the EU into going along with this by abusing the power of the office of President of the USA...backed by the corporate owned media who have become a de facto propaganda ministry.

True enough.

But there's an even larger game afoot; the other day, under the title, Iran: War or Privatization: All Out War or "Economic Conquest"? Michel Chossudovsky peeled the onion on what's really going on, and how the Iranian people cannot possibly win:  Bush, Great Britain, Israel, and probably France are bribing Iran's mullahs: If you merely allow our voracious, propaganda-driven consumerism -dependent corporations to turn your gentle, family values oriented population into the next American strip mall complete with a Bear Stearns on each corridor, we will allow you to stay in power (never mind all that trash we tossed at you about human rights heh heh; did you know we used to toss bits of tinfoil out of airplanes to fuzz radar signals?)

Iranian culture is an international treasure; Zoroastrianism, still the bedrock value system of Iran, if not its "official" religion, is the prototype of parts of Judaism and much of Christianity. A replica of the clay tablet on which Cyrus the Great inscribed the First declaration of Human Rights is on display at the United Nations The international community should declare the entire nation of Iran a protected historical site, lest it be looted in another one of Donald Rumsfeld's "stuff happens" moments.

But what would George Bush and his neocon handlers know of human rights and the United Nations?  That organization exists only to serve as Bushcon's shill; Appleton continues:

The idea of sanctions is that somehow if the people suffer enough they will overthrow their government. Would you the average middle class citizen try to overthrow your government if tomorrow Mr. Bush declared himself president for life for example? What would you do against the military and the police who have the keys to all the gun racks? Would you risk your life, limb and property to attempt the overthrow of your government? Don't ask other people to do what you haven't the courage to do yourself.

What are you going to do?

Those of you who live in Ed Royce's district in California:  listen to the glee in his voice as he describes how he expects the measures implemented with the Kyl Lieberman bill will cause Iranians to riot.  Does that disgust you?  What are you going to do about it?

Sign another petition? Try this one: An Open Letter to Barack Obama on Iran.  Over 150 people have signed this letter IN THE LAST HOUR.  

Call your congressperson another time, and get back the same boilerplate letter dictated by persons with a lot more money than you have?

Can you risk speaking out, or are you concerned that you might lose your job?  Do you fear that your phone might be tapped, your credit transactions monitored, your children's future impaired if you speak up, speak out, take a stand?

Is that why you remain silent?



Display:


Re: "What Gives Bush Right t Destabilize Iran (none / 0)

The courage of the knife but not of -the blood-. er, our OWN blood.


by Jeffersons Bible on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 10:32:46 PM EST

Re: "What Gives Bush Right t Destabilize Iran (2.00 / 1)

Now this as Looney left as you can get with a petition like this. I mean there are progressives and then they are the mother of all tree huggers.

Iranian culture is an international treasure; Zoroastrianism, still the bedrock value system of Iran, if not its "official" religion, is the prototype of parts of Judaism and much of Christianity. A replica of the clay tablet on which Cyrus the Great inscribed the First declaration of Human Rights is on display at the United Nations The international community should declare the entire nation of Iran a protected historical site, lest it be looted in another one of Donald Rumsfeld's "stuff happens" moments.

While we are it we should also declare Hamas, Hezbollah, the Khomeini and the Kudz force as national treasures too.


He was warmly received by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who called him "a leader that God has blessed us with at this time."
by roxfoxy on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 10:41:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "What Gives Bush Right t Destabilize Iran (none / 0)

pardon me your ignorance is showing.

Zoroastrianism IS the ethical progenitor of Christianity.  Zoroastrianism IS also the progenitor of Judaism's ethical core:  Hebrews exiled in Babylon, which was later conquered by Iranian king Cyrus, redacted their Torah while enjoying exile in Babylon -- yes, ENJOYing exile:  life in Iranian Babylon provided the free time, intellectual stimulation and atmosphere, and material support to reframe their previously oral tradition into the first cut at what became the Torah.

Remember the looting of the Baghdad museum?  How proud of that were you?  Iran IS a treasure trove of ancient history that is the foundation of Western civilization.   Isfahan is home to the world's most perfect domed structure; would it be a good idea to destroy it in some foolish shock and awe campaign? Would you like to see the White House harmed?


by Jeffersons Bible on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 11:45:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "What Gives Bush Right t Destabilize Iran (2.00 / 2)

I can see a petition to request that we must exert sanctions first. But to take off the military option from the table is ridiculous.

Unfortunately for you my ignorance allows me to look at the current IRAN and its role in funding terrorism and not just look at it from the rose colored glasses of historians.

Specifically this latest statement: IAEA Chief: Iran Could Make Nuke In 6 Months

Its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) were directly involved in the planning and support of terrorist acts and continued to exhort a variety of groups, especially Palestinian groups with leadership cadres in Syria and Lebanese Hizballah, to use terrorism in pursuit of their goals.

Iran maintained a high-profile role in encouraging anti-Israeli terrorist activity, rhetorically, operationally, and financially. Supreme Leader Khamenei and President Ahmadi-Nejad praised Palestinian terrorist operations, and Iran provided Lebanese Hizballah and Palestinian terrorist groups - notably HAMAS, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command - with extensive funding, training, and weapons.

The day they get off harming other cultures? I'll make sure to pay heed to their past culture. Till then I'll be more focused on other civilized cultures they are proving harmful to.

OH and Baghdad museum was looted by Iraqi's ( Overwhelmingly ). Apparently they have not convinced their own people to take pride in their own culture yet.

While we are at it- Iran was not too worried about their prefect dome during the 7 year war with Iraq.


He was warmly received by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who called him "a leader that God has blessed us with at this time."
by roxfoxy on Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 12:14:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "What Gives Bush Right t Destabilize Iran (none / 0)

That's a screaming headline that doesn't match what El Baradei said - he said that if Iran were to expel the inspectors, they could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a single bomb in six months to one year.

There are a lot of 'ifs' in there.  As things stand now there is no chance of us waking up six months from now with a nuclear Iran, without further developments.


by MeganLocke on Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 05:25:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "What Gives Bush Right t Destabilize Iran (2.00 / 1)

It would be an irresponsible statement from the head of the IAEA who is well respected. Either he is hedging his bet or he is being honest of what the facts on the ground tell him.

Similar to when he stated Iraq has no WMD before the war.


He was warmly received by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who called him "a leader that God has blessed us with at this time."
by roxfoxy on Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 10:37:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "What Gives Bush Right t Destabilize Iran (none / 0)

peace, roxy,
The dome in Isfehan was damaged in the war that Iraq waged on Iran, encouraged and supplied by the US.  

I saw the repairs.

Does your disdain of history extend to dismissal of zionism's desire to reclaim its ancient homeland?


by Jeffersons Bible on Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 07:19:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "What Gives Bush Right t Destabilize Iran (2.00 / 1)


No it's not History - it's JUST history that you base your petition on.

If we go by your singular outlook then modern day Americans would have to leave this country to hand it back to the Native Americans.


He was warmly received by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who called him "a leader that God has blessed us with at this time."
by roxfoxy on Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 10:44:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "What Gives Bush the Right?" (none / 0)

I wonder if anyone is aware that the House and Senate are voting on a resolution this week about Iran?

Two bipartisan Resolutions that are being widely construed as tantamount to a declaration of war on Iran are expected to be voted on by both houses of the U.S. Congress this week.

U.S. House of Representatives Resolution (HR 362) and Senate Resolution (SR 580), while non-binding and explicitly stating that they are not granting the Bush administration the authorization to attack Iran, call on the Administration to take a much harder line on Iran. This would include a naval blockade of Iran's ports, which would certainly be interpreted as an act of war.

Both the Senate and House Resolutions are based on factual errors, exaggerations, half-truths, and even outright lies. Therefore, it is of utmost urgency that Americans who oppose an attack on Iran know what the Resolutions actually contain, so that they can lobby their Congressional representatives, with facts in hand, to stop the Resolutions' passage in both the House and the Senate.

To that end, here is the guide to understanding Congress' "Iran War" Resolutions, as well as the errors, falsehoods, and exaggerations within them. Actual sentences from the Senate and House Resolutions are in italics; my rebuttals follow in normal text.

Article continues here at Huffington Post: How to Convince Your Congressperson Not to Attack Iran


by skohayes on Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 07:39:19 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.